Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> If no one objects, I'd like to push PEP 376 in the "accepted" status >> and go ahead with its implementation, >> with continuous feedback at Distutils-SIG as we did to build it. > > I think this isn't quite the process. In the past, every PEP required > BDFL pronouncement, which you should now seek.
Agreed. While Guido is highly likely to just accept the distutils-sig consensus on something like this, that doesn't eliminate the need for him to actually *say* that he is approving the PEP on that basis. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
