On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Nick Coghlan<ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> If no one objects, I'd like to push PEP 376 in the "accepted" status >>> and go ahead with its implementation, >>> with continuous feedback at Distutils-SIG as we did to build it. >> >> I think this isn't quite the process. In the past, every PEP required >> BDFL pronouncement, which you should now seek. > > Agreed. While Guido is highly likely to just accept the distutils-sig > consensus on something like this, that doesn't eliminate the need for > him to actually *say* that he is approving the PEP on that basis.
Sure. :-) So what *is* the distutils-sig consensus? And is there consensus outside of it? (Remember the ipaddr debacle. It's easy for people to miss an important PEP.) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
