Next(s) would seem good...
Alex
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2009, at 6:47 PM, John Arbash Meinel <john.mei...@canonical.com
> wrote:
Adam Olsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:04, Vitor Bosshard <algor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I see this as being useful for frozensets as well, where you can't
get
an arbitrary element easily due to the obvious lack of .pop(). I ran
into this recently, when I had a frozenset that I knew had 1 element
(it was the difference between 2 other sets), but couldn't get to
that
element easily (get the pun?)
item, = set_of_one
Interesting. It depends a bit on the speed of tuple unpacking, but
presumably that is quite fast. On my system it is pretty darn good:
0.101us "for x in s: break"
0.112us "x, = s"
0.122us "for x in s: pass"
So not quite as good as the for loop, but quite close.
John
=:->
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/aleaxit%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
