On 04:42 pm, ole...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:13 AM, <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On 12:48 pm, c...@msu.edu wrote:
[snip]
The most *exciting* part of pony-build, apart from the always-
riveting
spectacle of "titus rediscovering problems that buildbot solved 5
years
ago",
is the loose coupling of recording server to the build slaves and
build
reporters. My plan is to enable a simple and lightweight XML-RPC
and/or
REST-ish interface for querying the recording server from scripts or
other
Web
sites. �This has Brett aquiver with anticipation, I gather -- no more
visual
inspection of buildbot waterfall pages ;)
BuildBot has an XML-RPC interface. So Brett can probably do what he
wants
with BuildBot right now.
... but pony-build follows a different model
But BuildBot exists, is deployed, and can be used now, without waiting.
(Sorry, I don't really understand what point you were hoping to make
with your message, so I just thought I'd follow up in the same style and
hope that you'll understand my message even if I don't understand yours
:).
Jean-Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
