Arc Riley <arcriley <at> gmail.com> writes: > > +1 on ending with 2.6.I'm the maintainer of 3rd party Python 3-only packages > and have ported a few modules that we needed with some help from the 2to3 > tool. It's really not a big deal - and Py3 really is a massive improvement. > The main thing holding back the community are lazy and/or obstinate package > maintainers. If they spent half the time they've put into complaining about > Py3 into actually working to upgrade their code they'd be done now.
One thing you could do is explain (do you have a blog?) how Py3 is a massive improvement for you as a developer and package maintainer. We core developers obviously agree that py3k is better than 2.x, but the same opinion coming from a third-party developer would carry a different weight. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
