On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Carl Trachte <ctrac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/4/09, sstein...@gmail.com <sstein...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Maybe the 3.x line should just be put out of our misery, merged back >> to 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, and proceed as Glyph suggested in passing with >> increasing levels of deprecation until it just turns into 3.x on its >> own by running out of numbers. > > <delurk> > As a user, I'm horrified. Granted, I'm not the most high powered > user, but . . . > my employer is already providing me with a 3.0 Python version on one > of my work computers with the expectation that I'll be using it more > and more. > > Sorry to butt in, but is this a joke? I thought all this was hashed > out prior to inventing python 3.0. > </delurk>
I have no idea who "ssteinerX" is. He certainly doesn't speak for the core developers. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
