Tarek wrote: > > (I didn't digg on how Jython organizes things yet, any hint would be > appreciated)
The installation directory looks like it's organized just like CPython but I have no clue how user directories would/should be arranged. > > > > > Also if the purpose of this is for platform specific build directories > > it might be interesting to have multiple return values. For example in > > IronPython the minimal thing we'd want I think is a "cli" directory for > > .NET assemblies. But there could also be native extensions which are > > platform specific so we'd want "cli-x86" and "cli-x64" depending upon > > the platform. Jython might want the same thing as they add ctypes > > support. > > So like, having an architecture marker, that defaults to the current ? > > get_platform(architecture=platform.architecture) > How would you know what other architectures would be valid to pass in here? Returning a list would let the implementation say that it knows a certain set of architectural binaries are valid. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com