Paul Moore wrote: > 2010/1/18 R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>: >> So +1 from me for putting these in shutil. > > Conceptually, I'm happy with these going into shutil (and +1 on the > rest of Tarek's proposal, too!) > > To my mind, shutil is a module for higher-level operations on files - > the sort of things you'd do in shell commands, like move a batch of > files around (mv), create a directory tree (mkdir -p). Tarring or > zipping up a batch of files fits nicely into that space.
This is also reflected in the way at least Windows handles archives these days - it took them a couple of iterations to get it right (and resolve some of the performance impacts), but Explorer now does a decent job of integrating archives into the directory tree as "folders that happen to be compressed". Are archives as fundamental as directories and files? No. But in the context of shutil, the fact that their internal structure is largely about directories and files makes them more than just another arbitrary file type. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
