Reid Kleckner <r...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > If CPython development moves to distributed hg, the notion of 'blessed' > > branches (other than the PSF release branch) will, as I understand it, > > become somewhat obsolete. If you make a branch publicly available, anyone > > can grab it and merge it with their branch, just as they can with anyone > > elses. > > It's true that as Martin said, we can rebase our code to Py3K in a > branch on python.org any time we like, the question is more "if we do > the work, will the Python community accept it".
Of course! The Python community accepts all optional stuff. Personally, I think you've done a great job getting this far, and the fixes to LLVM alone are worth the effort, IMO. That PEP is a great interim project report. If what you're really asking is, "will the Python community accept it joyfully and enthusiastically, and embrace it to their hearts?", you'll have to put in more work to demonstrate real advantages before the answer is "yes", I'd think. Bill _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
