On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Stutzbach
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Brian Quinlan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> import futures
>
> +1 on the idea, -1 on the name.  It's too similar to "from __future__ import
> ...".

Futures is a common term for this, and implemented named this in other
languages. I don't think we should be adopting things that are common,
and found elsewhere and then renaming them.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to