On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Jesse Noller <jnol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Future.html > According to that link, Java has a module named "Concurrent" with an interface named "Future". You're proposing a module named "Futures" with a class named "Future". Why not name your module "concurrent"? That would eliminate the confusion with "from __future__". I don't see a problem with keeping the class name. Plus, a "concurrent" module might be useful for things other than Futures, in the future. ;-) Just my 0.02 cents, -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
