>> I'm +1 on adding a nice task queuing system, -1 on calling it by any
>> other name. ;-)
Nick> As Guido said, let's call the nice task queuing system "futures"
Nick> and point people wanting a full-power asynchronous process model
Nick> to Twisted
Can this module at least be pushed down into a package? I think
"concurrent" or "concurrency" were both suggested at one point.
Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
