s...@pobox.com wrote: > >> I'm +1 on adding a nice task queuing system, -1 on calling it by any > >> other name. ;-) > > Nick> As Guido said, let's call the nice task queuing system "futures" > Nick> and point people wanting a full-power asynchronous process model > Nick> to Twisted > > Can this module at least be pushed down into a package? I think > "concurrent" or "concurrency" were both suggested at one point.
Yep, I believe "concurrent.futures" was picked as the name elsewhere in the thread. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
