On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 23:55, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe the more important part of Barry's suggested change here is > requiring a link to the archived message (usually from python-dev) where > the PEP was accepted (be it directly by you as BDFL, or by consensus > from a "sufficient" number of core developers). This will likely also > help with reminding people to announce on python-dev when PEPs are > accepted by consensus (or by you) somewhere like PyCon or a sprint.
Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and used for Rejected PEPs, as well? Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
