On Apr 28, 2010, at 09:22 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 23:55, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I believe the more important part of Barry's suggested change here is >> requiring a link to the archived message (usually from python-dev) where >> the PEP was accepted (be it directly by you as BDFL, or by consensus >> from a "sufficient" number of core developers). This will likely also >> help with reminding people to announce on python-dev when PEPs are >> accepted by consensus (or by you) somewhere like PyCon or a sprint. > >Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and >used for Rejected PEPs, as well?
Good point. What do you think about 'Resolution'? As to Guido's point about the decision making process, Nick's right. I just want to make sure we can capture the resolution in the PEP, be it by BDFL pronouncement or "hey, silence is acceptance" email. Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
