On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:43:57 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > > In general, this reminds me of the ipaddr discussions. I read through > the thread from March real quick to see if there was reasoning there > why this package should be an exception from the "normal" standards > track (that is, ripen on PyPI, then moving it in the stdlib when it's > mature -- where "mature" is another word for dead, really).
I disagree that a stdlib module is a dead module. It is perfectly possible to augment the API with new functionality without breaking compatibility. You can also deprecate old APIs if you want. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
