On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:34:22 -0400 Jesse Noller <jnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Brian has already agreed to name spacing it to "concurrent.futures" - > this means it will be a small part to a much larger concurrent.* > implementation ala Java.
What I would question here is what other things will be part of the "concurrent" package, and who will implement them. Are there plans for that? (or even tracker issues open?) Apart from that, it seems to me that the only serious issues blocking PEP approval are Glyph's interesting remarks. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
