On 01:09 pm, arcri...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
It is not "critical self-evaluation" to repeat "Python 3 is not ready"
as
litany in #Python and your supporting website. I use the word "litany"
here
because #Python refers users to what appears to be a religious website
http://python-commandments.org/python3.html
It's not my website. I don't own the domain, I don't control the
hosting, I didn't generate the content, I have no access to change
anything on it. I've barely even frequent #python in the last three
years.
Perhaps you were directing those comments at Stephen Thorne though
(although I don't know if he's any more involved in it than I am so
don't take this as anything but idle speculation).
I have further witnessed (and even been the other party to) you and
other
ops in #Python telling package developers, who have clearly said that
they
are working to port their legacy package to Py3, that "Python 3 is not
ready".
I'm not going to condone or condemn events which I didn't observe.
However you've never witnessed me discouraging developers who were
actively porting software to Python 3 because I've never done it. I'm
sure this was an honest mistake and you simply confused me with someone
else.
Besides rally against it what have you, as a Twisted developer, done
regarding the Python 3 migration process?
This, however, I find extremely insulting. I don't answer to you. The
only reason I'm replying at all is to correct the two pieces of
misinformation in your message.
I don't see how this discussion can go anywhere productive, so I'll do
my best to make this my last post on the subject. Obviously I made a
mistake posting to the thread at all.
Jean-Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
