On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Steve Holden <st...@holdenweb.com> wrote: > Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: >> On Jun 19, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > Which is yet another reason I don't think it would be productive to > attempt any kind of pre-emptive action against the #python team. They do > serve a very useful purpose, and there is reasoned logic behind their > position even if we might wish it were different. > > regards > Steve
I'm one of them so I'm a bit biased, but I'd say the biggest argument is that it's not set in stone (I'm trying to fix it and the regulars have been nothing but cooperative). Nobody from the #python people realized this was a huge thing for people up until today. It's been up there for a long time, and it's becoming less and less defensible every passing day (and that's a good thing!), so we're basically debating what ought to change and when. It's not really a matter of disliking, it's more of a matter of "um, it's still up there because nobody thought it had to go" :-) FWIW: I think a separate #python3 channel would be a really bad idea. thanks Laurens _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
