On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >> True, C++ does introduce a >> lot of new features, but most programmers migrating from C to C++ >> don't learn to use them properly for years, if ever, I'm told. > > I don't see how Python 3 has that problem. You can be productive here > and now in Python 3, re-using your knowledge of Python 2 with a bit of > added information.
Yeah, the significant issues with Python 3 over Python 2 *only* apply to people with legacy Python 2 code to worry about. The one thing that makes Python 3 potentially less desirable than Python 2 for some new applications is that the third party library support isn't quite as good yet. As more of the "big" libraries and frameworks provide Python 3 compatible versions, that factor will go away. As far as I can tell, with 3 years still to go on my own original prediction of 5+ years for Python 3 to start to be competitive with Python 2 for programming mindshare, adoption actually seems to be progressing fairly well. A lot of key functionality is either already supported in Python 3 or will be soon, and a lot of the rest is at least talking about plans for Python 3 compatibility. It's just that 5 years can seem like an eternity in the internet age, so sometimes people see the relative lack of adoption of Python 3 at this stage and start to panic about it being a failure. Now, if we're still having this conversation in 2013, then I'll admit we have a problem with the Python 3 uptake rate ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
