On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to get consensus as to whether folks feel that a PEP is needed. My > own thought is that I'd rather not do a PEP specific to this change, but I > would update PEP 384 with the implications on .so versioning. Please also > feel free to review the patch in that issue.
I suspect you could write a new PEP faster than you could convince those suggesting the change needs a PEP (including me) that one isn't necessary. Presumably you were going to do a summary email for the mailing list anyway - just tidy up the formatting a bit and check it in as a PEP instead :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
