On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > > be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3 > > stdlib to move forward, without needing a major new spec to settle > > out implementation questions. > > If a WSGI-1-compatible protocol seems more sensible to folks, I'm > personally happy to defer discussion on PEP 444 or any other > backwards-incompatible proposal. > I think both make sense, making WSGI 1 sensible for Python 3 (as well as other small errata like the size hint) doesn't detract from PEP 444 at all, IMHO. -- Ian Bicking | http://blog.ianbicking.org
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
