At 06:52 PM 9/21/2010 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:09:44 -0400
"P.J. Eby" <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote:
> While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would
> be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3
> stdlib to move forward, without needing a major new spec to settle
> out implementation questions.
If this allows the Web situation in Python 3 to be improved faster
and with less hassle then all the better.
There's something strange in your proposal: it mentions WSGI 2 at
several places while there's no guarantee about what WSGI 2 will be (is
there?).
Sorry - "WSGI 2" should be read as shorthand for, "whatever new spec
succeeds PEP 333", whether that's PEP 444 or something else.
It just means that any new spec that doesn't have to be
backward-compatible can (and should) more thoroughly address the
issue in question.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
