Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> writes: > I don't agree with this. Until it's documented, it's an implementation > detail and should be able to change without notice.
If it's an implementation detail, shouldn't it be named as one (i.e. with a leading underscore)? > If someone wants to depend on some undocumented detail of the > directory layout it's their problem (like people depending on bytecode > and other stuff). I would say that names without a single leading underscore are part of the public API, whether documented or not. -- \ “Your [government] representative owes you, not his industry | `\ only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, | _o__) if he sacrifices it to your opinion.” —Edmund Burke, 1774 | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
