On Nov 03, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Ben Finney wrote: >Is this a case where it would be better if the package names had the >leading underscore: ‘_utils’, ‘_suite’, etc.? > >Does the convention on single-leading-underscore identifiers as “don't >rely on this name staying the same in future versions” hold for package >names?
I would vote "yes". I have seen more and more packages use this convention to signal that the module name is not intended to be imported directly. This should be part of any PEP 8 recommendation, IMO. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
