On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:10 PM, geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <l...@laurensvh.be> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: > > <snip> > >> What is true is that there's a new and temporary "NO ARCH" rule in the >> topic > > It's your channel and you can do with it what you want, but seriously- > does this strike you as the best response to a widespread problem? > You're basically telling people to get lost, and in all caps no less. > > Geremy Condra
It is not by any means "my channel" -- I apologize if I gave anyone the impression that I alone decided that was going up, because that's not true. Unfortunately Freenode does not give us the ability to be more verbose in IRC topics. In fact, to put that up, we had to remove something less important. As a result, NO ARCH is roughly the best we can do. (Similarly NO LOL is really NO CHATSPEAK, but topics are length limited.) cheers lvh _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
