On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:18:40 +0000 Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > On 11/11/2010 15:17, Łukasz Langa wrote: > > Am 11.11.2010 16:05, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > >> Agreed, though I wouldn't *remove* __all__'s, I would establish a > >> convention > >> where they can be generated programmatically. Keeping __all__ in > >> sync with > >> the code is a PITA. It screams for automation. > > > > You mean runtime automation, e.g. creating __all__ on the fly omitting > > underscored names? > > > Writing code to generate a __all__ that duplicates the default behaviour > seems redundant to me.
Agreed with Michael. __all__ is useful mostly when you don't adhere to the convention that private APIs should have a leading underscore. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
