Am 27.01.2011 23:53, schrieb Stefan Behnel: > "Martin v. Löwis", 24.01.2011 21:17: >> If the string is created directly with the canonical representation >> (see below), this representation doesn't take a separate memory block, >> but is allocated right after the PyUnicodeObject struct. > > Does this mean it's supposed to become a PyVarObject?
What do you mean by "become"? Will it be declared as such? No. > Antoine proposed > that, too. Apart from breaking (more or less) all existing C subtyping > code, this will also make it harder to subtype it in new code. I don't > like that idea at all. Why will it break all existing subtyping code? See the PEP: Only objects created through PyUnicode_New will be affected - I don't think this can include objects of a subtype. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
