On Mar 07, 2011, at 07:44 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >I agree with Thomas' answer here: while a branch makes it easier to >maintain a patch (but you can also use e.g. Mercurial Queues), it >doesn't make it easier to *review*. You are assuming that I, as a >reviewer, want to know about the history of changesets that led to the >patch, but I don't: I want to read the patch as a cohesive whole, and I >couldn't care less about the various typo fixes, style changes, >performance tweaks that were checked in all along.
I hear this complaint a lot from hg and git users, so maybe it's just the nature of the tools. In which case, I'm fine with whatever works better for Python. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
