On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:17:05 +0100 Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > On 05/04/2011 20:57, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > [snip...] > > [Brett] > >> (sorry, Raymond, for picking on heapq, but is > >> was what bit the PyPy people most recently =). > > No worries, it wasn't even my code. Someone > > donated it. The was a discusion on python-dev > > and collective agreement to allow it to have > > semantic differences that would let it run faster. > > IIRC, the final call was made by Uncle Timmy. > > > > The major problem that pypy had with heapq, aside from semantic > differences, was (is?) that if you run the tests against the pure-Python > version (without the C accelerator) then tests *fail*. This means they > have to patch the CPython tests in order to be able to use the pure > Python version.
Was the tests patch contributed back? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
