On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:59:53 +0200 brett.cannon <python-check...@python.org> wrote: > Technical details of > +the VM providing the accelerated code are allowed to differ as > +necessary, e.g., a class being a ``type`` when implemented in C.
I don't understand what this means ("a class being a ``type`` when implemented in C"). > +If this test were to provide 100% branch coverage for > +``heapq.heappop()`` in the pure Python implementation then the > +accelerated C code would be allowed to be added to CPython's standard > +library. If it did not, then the test suite would need to be updated > +until 100% branch coverage was provided before the accelerated C code > +could be added. I really think that's a too strong requirement. We don't want to paralyze development until the stdlib gets 100% coverage in the tests suite. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com