Nick Coghlan, 19.04.2011 10:57:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I think this social problem of the PEP can only be solved if the CPython
project stops doing the major share of the stdlib maintenance, thus freeing
its own developer capacities to focus on CPython related improvements and
optimisations, just like the other implementations currently do. I'm not
sure we want that at this point.

We've made a start on that aspect by granting CPython access to
several of the core developers on the other VMs. The idea being that
they can update the pure Python versions of modules directly rather
than having to wait for one of us to do it on their behalf.

Of course, as Maciej pointed out, that is currently hindered by the
fact that the other VMs aren't targeting 3.3 yet, and that's where the
main CPython development is happening.

A related question is: when other Python VM projects try to port a given C module, would they actually invest the time to write a pure Python version that may or may not run within acceptable performance bounds for them, or would they prefer saving time by writing only a native implementation directly for their VM for performance reasons? Maybe both, maybe not. If they end up writing a native version after prototyping in Python, is the prototype worth including in the shared stdlib, even if its performance is completely unacceptable for everyone? Or, if they write a partial module and implement another part of it natively, would the incomplete implementation qualify as a valid addition to the shared stdlib?

Implementing a 100% compatible and "fast enough" Python version of a module is actually a rather time consuming task. I think we are expecting some altruism here that is easily sacrificed for time constraints, in any of the Python VM projects. CPython is just in the unlucky position of representing the status-quo.

Stefan

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to