On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >>> I think this social problem of the PEP can only be solved if the CPython >>> project stops doing the major share of the stdlib maintenance, thus freeing >>> its own developer capacities to focus on CPython related improvements and >>> optimisations, just like the other implementations currently do. I'm not >>> sure we want that at this point. >> >> We've made a start on that aspect by granting CPython access to >> several of the core developers on the other VMs. The idea being that >> they can update the pure Python versions of modules directly rather >> than having to wait for one of us to do it on their behalf. >> >> Of course, as Maciej pointed out, that is currently hindered by the >> fact that the other VMs aren't targeting 3.3 yet, and that's where the >> main CPython development is happening. > > We're also slightly hindered by the fact that not all of us got > privilages so far (Antonio Cuni in particular).
Yeah, I emailed him this morning, I dropped the ball on his commit bit post pycon due to email overload. I'm resolving it today. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
