On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:27:00 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <step...@xemacs.org> wrote: > > One could also use the somewhat euphemistic "unprofessional language". > That points to why such changes are justified despite an author's > right to have her mode of expression respected -- the Python project > aims at professionalism, and offensive language detracts from it.
I sincerely hope we don't start using the word "professional" to denote "careful" or "good quality". Most professional work is crap, and that's why we have open source. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
