On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >> Users of codecs.open() or users of codecs.Stream* classes? > > I would think both. Is there any reason to continue using codecs.open()?
It's the easiest way to write Unicode friendly code that spans both 2.x and 3.x. The problem is that naive 2.x code will migrate to the optimised IO stack automatically on the 2.x -> 3.x transition, while code that tried to do the right thing has to be changed manually (either in 3.x only, or by switching to the io module for 2.x as well) in order to adjust for the differences in argument order. The idea behind changing codecs.open to be a wrapper around io.open was to allow such code to switch to the new optimised IO stack as easily as code that just uses the open builtin. If it's acceptable for the builtin behaviour to change (far more substantially), why not change codecs.open as well? Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
