On 8/11/2011 3:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le 29/07/2011 19:01, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
I will add your alternative to the PEP (except if you would like to do
that yourself?). If I understood correctly, you propose to:
* rename codecs.open() to codecs.open_stream()
* change codecs.open() to reuse open() (and so io.TextIOWrapper)
(...)
+1
Ok, most people prefer this option. Should I modify the PEP to "move"
this option has the first/main proposition (move my proposition as an
alternative?), or can the PEP be validated in the current state?
I would relabel the above as the Minimal Change Alternative or M.A.L.
alternative or whatever and possibly move it but in any case note that
Guido (and others) accepted that alternative with consideration of more
drastic changes deferred to later. And add an explicit reference to the
email you quoted.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
