On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 8/11/2011 3:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: >> Ok, most people prefer this option. Should I modify the PEP to "move" >> this option has the first/main proposition (move my proposition as an >> alternative?), or can the PEP be validated in the current state? > > I would relabel the above as the Minimal Change Alternative or M.A.L. > alternative or whatever and possibly move it but in any case note that Guido > (and others) accepted that alternative with consideration of more drastic > changes deferred to later. And add an explicit reference to the email you > quoted.
Yeah, definitely retitle/rewrite/rearrange to be clear what Guido accepted and then state that any future deprecation of components in the codecs module will be dealt with as a new PEP. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
