On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:02:45 -0500 PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > > Among other things, it means that: > > * There's only one codebase > * If the conversion isn't perfect, you only have to fix it once > * Line numbers are the same > * There's no conversion step slowing down development > > So, I expect that if the approach is at all viable, it'll quickly become > the One Obvious Way to do it.
Well, with all due respect, this is hand-waving. Sure, if it's viable, then fine. The question is if it's "viable", precisely. That depends on which project we're talking about. > In effect, 2to3 is a "purity" solution, but > six is more like a "practicality" solution. This sounds like your personal interpretation. I see nothing "pure" in 2to3. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
