On 28/01/2012 04:44, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Michael Foord writes:> >> Assuming the module is then promoted to the the standard library proper in > >> release ``3.X+1``, it will be moved to a permanent location in the library:: > >> > >> import example > >> > >> And importing it from ``__preview__`` will no longer work. > > Why not leave it accessible through __preview__ too? > > +1 Er, doesn't this contradict your point about using try: from __preview__ import spam except ImportError: import spam ? I think it's a bad idea to introduce a feature that's *supposed* to break (in the sense of "make a break", ie, change the normal pattern) with every release and then try to avoid breaking (in the sense of "causing an unexpected failure") code written by people who don't want to follow the discipline of keeping up with changing APIs. If they want that stability, they should wait for the stable release. Modules should become unavailable from __preview__ as soon as they have a stable home.
I like not breaking people's code where *possible*. Michael -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
