On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:50:21 -0500, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > Currently we handle 3.2 compatibility in packages that "straddle" via > six-like functions. We can continue doing this as necessary. If the
It seems to me that this undermines your argument in favor of u''. Why can't you just continue to do the above for 3.3 and beyond? Frankly, *I'm* not worried about the uptake pace of Python3. It feels to me like it is pretty much on schedule, if not ahead of it. But to repeat, I'm not voting -1 here, I'm playing devil's advocate. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
