Indeed, the wrangling has gone too far already. I'm accepting the PEP. It's about as harmless as they come. Make it so.
--Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone) On Feb 27, 2012 1:12 PM, "Chris McDonough" <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:07 +0000, Paul Moore wrote: > > On 27 February 2012 20:39, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > > > Note that u'' literals are sort of the tip of the iceberg here; > > > supporting them will obviously not make development under the subset an > > > order of magnitude less sucky, just a tiny little bit less sucky. > There > > > are other extremely annoying things, like str(bytes) returning the repr > > > of a bytestring on Python 3. That's almost as irritating as the > absence > > > of u'' literals, but we have to evaluate one thing at a time. > > > > So. Am I misunderstanding here, or are you suggesting that this > > particular PEP doesn't help you much, but if it's accepted, it > > represents "the thin end of the wedge" for a series of subsequent PEPs > > suggesting fixes for a number of other "extremely annoying things"...? > > > > I'm sure that's not what you meant, but it's certainly what it sounded > > like to me! > > I'm way too lazy. The political wrangling is just too draining > (especially over something so trivial). But I will definitely support > other proposals that make it easier to straddle, sure. > > - C > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
