On 27 February 2012 20:39, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > Note that u'' literals are sort of the tip of the iceberg here; > supporting them will obviously not make development under the subset an > order of magnitude less sucky, just a tiny little bit less sucky. There > are other extremely annoying things, like str(bytes) returning the repr > of a bytestring on Python 3. That's almost as irritating as the absence > of u'' literals, but we have to evaluate one thing at a time.
So. Am I misunderstanding here, or are you suggesting that this particular PEP doesn't help you much, but if it's accepted, it represents "the thin end of the wedge" for a series of subsequent PEPs suggesting fixes for a number of other "extremely annoying things"...? I'm sure that's not what you meant, but it's certainly what it sounded like to me! Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
