[erroneouly hit send button before instead of edit menu above it]
On 2/29/2012 2:34 PM, Stefan Krah wrote:
Greg Ewing<greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
Options 2) and 3) would ideally entail one backwards
incompatible bugfix: In 2.7 and 3.2 assignment to a memoryview
with format 'B' rejects integers but accepts byte objects, but
according to the struct syntax mandated by the PEP it should be
the other way round.
If implementation and PEP conflict, the normal question is 'what does
the doc say?' as doc takes precedent over PEP. However, in this case the
'MemoryView objects' section under 'Concrete objects' says nothing about
the above that I could see and refers to Buffer Protocal in Abstract
Objects Layer. I did not see anything there either, but could have
missed it.
Maybe a compromise could be made to accept both in the backport?
That would avoid breaking old code while allowing code that does
the right thing to work.
This looks a bit like an enhancement ;-)
This could definitely be done. But backporting is beginning to look
unlikely, since we currently have three +1 for "too complex to
backport".
My comment was more 'unnecessary to backpart'. This is based on the
following thoughts (which could have mistakes).
* I do not see enough benefit that I could wish you to write or anyone
else to review a bugfix patch. I would in no way stop you if this
continue to itch you ;-).
* Sorting out bugfix changes from feature looks complex and possibly
contentious and might take some time to discuss.
* 3.2.3 is, I presume, less than a month away, and if that is missed,
the next and last bugfix will be 3.2.4 at about the same time as 3.3.0.
At that time, the full new memoryview version would be a better target.
* As for porting, my impression is that the PEP directly affects only C
code and Python code using ctypes and only some fraction of those. If
the bugfix-only patch is significantly different from complete patch,
porting to 3.2 would be significantly different from porting to 3.3. So
I can foresee a temptation to just port to 3.3 anyway.
I'm not strongly in favor of backporting myself. The main reason for
me would be to prevent having additional 2->3 or 3->2 porting
obstacles.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
