On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Peter Moody <pmo...@google.com> wrote: > Just checking in: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> At the very least: >> - the IP Interface API needs to move to a point where it more clearly >> *is* an IP Address and *has* an associated IP Network (rather than >> being the other way around) > > This is done [1]. There's cleanup that needs to happen here, but the > interface classes are now subclasses of the respective address > classes. > > Now I need to apply some consistency and then move on to the remaining > issues points: > >> - IP Network needs to behave more like an ordered set of sequential IP >> Addresses (without sometimes behaving like an Address in its own >> right)
This is done [2]. Consistent iterable apis and polish left to do. Cheers, peter [2] http://code.google.com/p/ipaddress-py/source/detail?r=578ef1777018211f536cacd29b6750086430fd141 >> - iterable APIs should consistently produce iterators (leaving users >> free to wrap list() around the calls if they want the concrete >> realisation) > > Cheers, > peter > > [1] > http://code.google.com/p/ipaddress-py/source/detail?r=10dd6a68139fb99116219865afcd1c183777e8cc > (the date is munged b/c I rebased to my original commit before submitting). > > -- > Peter Moody Google 1.650.253.7306 > Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038 -- Peter Moody Google 1.650.253.7306 Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038 _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
