On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:17:06 -0400 PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > > > So, my first question is: Why not simply rely on the already built-in > > timeout > > > support in the socket module? > > > > In case you didn't notice, the built-in timeout support *also* uses > > select(). > > > > That's not really the point; the frameworks that implement nonblocking I/O > by replacing the socket module (and Stackless is only one of many) won't be > using that code.
Then they should also replace the select module. Again, I don't think SocketServer (or any other stdlib module) should be designed in this regard. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
