On May 09, 2012, at 05:20 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Ah, good point. In that case, consider me convinced: static method it
>is. It can join mro() as the second non-underscore method defined on
>type().
+1
If I may dip into the bikeshed paint once more. I think it would be useful to
establish a naming convention for alternative constructors implemented as
{static,class}methods. I don't like `build_class()` much. Would you be
opposed to `type.new()`?
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
