Given that the statement form is referred to as a "class definition", and this is the dynamic equivalent, I'm inclined to go with "type.define()". Dynamic type definition is more consistent with existing terminology than dynamic type creation.
-- Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
