On Sun, 20 May 2012 18:51:27 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > PEP 3135 defines the new zero-argument form of super() as implicitly > equivalent to super(__class__, <first argument>), and up until 3.2 has > behaved accordingly: if you accessed __class__ from inside a method, > you would receive a reference to the lexically containing class. > > In 3.3, that currently doesn't work: you get NameError instead > (http://bugs.python.org/issue14857) > > While the 3.2 behaviour wasn't documented in the language reference, > it's *definitely* documented in PEP 3135 (and my recent updates to the > 3.3 version of the metaclass docs were written accordingly - that's > how I discovered the problem)
The question is, do we want to support it? What's the use case? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
