2012/5/20 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: > PEP 3135 defines the new zero-argument form of super() as implicitly > equivalent to super(__class__, <first argument>), and up until 3.2 has > behaved accordingly: if you accessed __class__ from inside a method, > you would receive a reference to the lexically containing class.
I don't understand why PEP 3135 cares how it's implemented. It's silly enough that you can get the class by "using" super (even just referencing the name). Thus that you can get __class__ reeks of more an implementation detail than a feature to me. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
