On 8/18/2012 11:47 AM, MRAB wrote:
I vote -0. The issue can also be addressed with a small and simple
helper function that wraps urlparse and compares the query parameter. Or
you cann urlencode() with `sorted(qs.items)` instead of `qs` in the
application.
Hm. That's actually a good point.
Seems adequate to me. Most programs wouldn't care about the order,
because most web frameworks grab whatever is there in whatever order,
and present it to the web app in their own order.
Programs that care, or which talk to web apps that care, are unlikely to
want the order from a non-randomized dict, and so have already taken
care of ordering issues, so undoing the randomization seems like a
solution in search of a problem (other than for poorly written test cases).
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
